has the advantage of making clear not only what is at stake but what the fundamental issues are on which the polarized positions turn. How, then, shall we think our way through the interaction of our exegesis of John 5:26 (and, implicitly, other texts supporting the eternal generation of the Son) with the issues of what we have (sometimes rather glibly) referred to as the Son’s submission or dependence or subordination? Five reflections follow: First, all sides ought to agree that one may distinguish
Page 94